Morgan Stanley Drops Out of the Protocol for Broker Recruiting

Posted on November 3rd, 2017 at 3:24 PM
 Morgan Stanley Drops Out of the Protocol for Broker Recruiting

From the Desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law LLC:

Morgan Stanley has announced that it has pulled out of the Protocol for Broker Recruiting (“Protocol”) and thereafter any broker moving to another firm will be subject to its one-year non-solicitation agreement. Morgan Stanley sent a blast email to all brokers on October 29th. It is unclear whether other major firms will follow the lead of Morgan Stanley but most likely they will do so.

Over a decade ago, many firms, including Morgan Stanley, agreed to follow the Protocol in an attempt to reduce litigation costs created by attempts to prevent brokers from calling their former customers. The Protocol allows brokers to take with them only customer names, addresses, phone numbers, emails and account titles when they transition to other firms.

However, in recent years, the Protocol has not served a useful purpose for larger firms because more than 1,600 small broker-dealers and registered investment advisory firms have become signatories, allowing them to recruit from the bigger firms without fear of litigation.

In a statement from Morgan Stanley, it justified its move away from the Protocol by underscoring a commitment to spend money on retaining experienced advisors and training new ones rather than hiring them from rivals under the Protocol.

The attorneys at Eccleston Law assist reps transition, negotiate their transition agreements, and defend reps when firms file suit.

The attorneys of Eccleston Law LLC represent investors and advisors nationwide in securities and employment matters. The securities lawyers at Eccleston Law also practice a variety of other areas of practice for financial advisors including Broker Litigation & ArbitrationStrategic Consulting ServicesRegulatory  MattersTransition Contract Review, and much more. Our attorneys draw on a combined experience of nearly 65 years in delivering the highest quality legal services. If you are in need of legal services, contact us to schedule a one-on-one consultation today.

Related Attorneys: James J. Eccleston

Tags: Jim Eccleston, Eccleston Law, Eccleston Law LLC, Eccleston, Morgan Stanley

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

If the regulators are after you, and are trying to make a case against you, and you are going to contest their allegations against you, make sure you have the best securities industry defense lawyers, Eccleston Law Firm. My case was spun into a combination of penalties including fines, cash settlements, CE courses and suspension. They were the best I have seen in action. When all was said and done, they had done their magic, my situation was negotiated and settled with a simple "letter of caution" and a case closed without action. It is the most important legal business decision you will ever make, make it Eccleston Law.

Rick R.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

March 12, 2025
GPB Capital Investors May Receive Some Compensation Under Proposed Distribution Plan

GPB Capital Holdings investors have not received returns on their investments since 2018. According to InvestmentNews, after years of litigation, a court-appointed receiver has submitted a plan to return funds to the 17,000 investors who purchased $1.8 billion in GPB limited partnerships.

March 11, 2025
Former CNBC Analyst Pleads Guilty to $2.7 Million Securities Fraud Scheme

James Arthur McDonald Jr., a former financial advisor and frequent CNBC guest analyst, has agreed to plead guilty to securities fraud, admitting to defrauding investors out of at least $2.7 million, as reported by ThinkAdvisor. The felony charge carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in federal prison.

March 10, 2025
Wells Fargo and Merrill Lynch Settle SEC Charges Over Cash Sweep Program Policies

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has announced settlements with Wells Fargo Clearing Services LLC, Wells Fargo Advisors Financial Network LLC, and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated over allegations that they failed to implement proper policies and procedures for their cash sweep programs.