Tr?id=566623520170033&ev=PageView&noscript=1

Bank of America and Merrill Lynch Settle with FINRA for Supervisory Failures

Posted on September 30th, 2024 at 3:37 PM
Bank of America and Merrill Lynch Settle with FINRA for Supervisory Failures

From the desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law

Bank of America and its subsidiary, Merrill Lynch, have agreed to a $3 million fine and censure as part of a settlement with FINRA over long-term supervisory failures. These failures, which occurred from 2015 to 2019, involved inadequate monitoring of potentially manipulative trading activities by their customers.

According to FINRA, both Merrill Lynch and Bank of America Securities, the institutional broker-dealer arm, relied on third-party surveillance systems to detect market manipulation tactics, such as wash trading and prearranged trading. However, the parameters of these systems were "too narrow" and failed to properly flag suspicious activities. InvestmentNews reports that the firms did not take sufficient steps to evaluate whether the surveillance modules were effective or if additional monitoring was necessary.

In addition, due to a coding error, Merrill Lynch's surveillance systems failed to monitor over-the-counter (OTC) securities and warrants trading for potential manipulation. According to InvestmentNews, the oversight went undetected from 2016 until January 2019, allowing potentially problematic trades to go unchecked.

Between 2017 and 2018, Merrill Lynch further neglected to detect manipulative trades in OTC securities due to a failure to purchase the necessary data feed from its third-party vendor. As a result, both firms missed hundreds of alerts for approximately 700 potentially manipulative equity trades and 125,000 options trades.

The issue came to light in August 2020, following a regulatory inquiry. Internal testing had previously identified several red flags, which the firms failed to address.

FINRA found the firms in violation of Rule 3011, which requires firms to implement reasonably designed supervisory systems, and Rule 2010, which mandates that firms maintain high standards of commercial honor. Merrill Lynch and Bank of America neither admitted nor denied the findings. Of the $3 million fine, $699,000 will go to FINRA, while the remainder will be distributed to exchanges such as the NYSE and Nasdaq.

Eccleston Law LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, transition, regulatory, and disciplinary matters.  

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law, finra

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next
Quotes Bigger

Jim, Stephany and the whole team were a God send.  We felt like we were put into a situation where we had no advocate. Jim’s team came in with a strong, well laid out strategy on how to get our story heard. Where our outside compliance company had no ability to help, our Broker Dealer was impenitent, and the regulators were aggressive pursuing vague rules, Jim came like a barricade against an assault we did not understand. Though you pay member dues to be affiliated with FINRA and a B/D, you have no voice. The only thing that is truly heard in this un-level playing field is a bulldog’s bark like Jim’s. I would encourage anyone to call Jim and his team to find a real ally in the tough and complicated world of securities regulation. They are truly the best.

Greg P.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

1787157891 Law
August 19, 2026
Former UBS Financial Advisor Suspended and Fined Over Unauthorized Trading Allegations

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) suspended a former UBS Wealth Management USA broker for three months and fined him $10,000 after finding that he executed hundreds of trades in two customers' accounts without the required written authorization.

1787156982 Law
August 19, 2026
FINRA Suspends Former Gradient Securities Advisor

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has suspended former Gradient Securities representative Mark J.

1787070589 Law
August 18, 2026
Senior Protection Case Study: Edward Jones and Senior Investor Safeguards

A recent incident involving Edward Jones illustrates how challenging it may be to employ safeguards for protecting older clients from financial exploitation.