FINRA Panel Order Advisor to Pay $2.6 Million for Soliciting Former Clients

Posted on June 26th, 2024 at 3:14 PM
FINRA Panel Order Advisor to Pay $2.6 Million for Soliciting Former Clients

From the desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law

A FINRA arbitration panel ruled against advisor Nicole E. Sennett for allegedly attempting to solicit former clients after selling her practice to Monocacy Wealth Partners. The panel ordered Sennett to pay $2,557,000 in compensatory damages to Monocacy, based in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, and its founding partners, Scott A. Brantingson and Scott M. Brantingson.

According to AdvisorHub, in addition to the monetary damages, the arbitrators issued an injunction preventing Sennett from soliciting any clients listed in the asset purchase agreement. She also is prohibited from discussing or disparaging Monocacy or its founders, giving financial advice to, or accepting any listed clients, even if the client initiates contact.

Sennett faces additional liability for damages amounting to four times 1 percent of any assets that transfer after the award is issued. Sennett counterclaimed that Monocacy breached the asset purchase agreement by refusing her access to certain books and records. She also requested the panel to void the asset purchase agreement. As reported by AdvisorHub, the panel rejected her counterclaims.

Although Raymond James was not a named party in the arbitration, it controlled the payments to Sennett under the asset purchase agreement. Future payments owed to Sennett are to be released to Monocacy to offset the $2.6 million she owes.

AdvisorHub reports that this case highlights the ongoing risks for buyers in wealth management transactions, as sellers sometimes attempt to restart their practice. Courts have occasionally invalidated non-compete agreements, siding with sellers in such disputes.

 

Eccleston Law LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, transition, regulatory, and disciplinary matters.

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law, finra

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

I just received this letter from the CFP Board. Thank you, Thank you, THANK YOU!

David Y

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

February 2, 2026
California Investors Allege Unsuitable DST Recommendations in FINRA Arbitration

Two investors from the San Francisco Bay Area have filed a FINRA arbitration claim against brokerage firm Realized Financial and its financial advisors.

January 30, 2026
FINRA Arbitration Panel Orders J.P. Morgan to Amend Form U-5, Flags Potential Pattern of Conduct

A Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) arbitration panel recently issued an unusually detailed decision in a dispute between J.P. Morgan Securities and former advisor Joshua David Sappi Biering, shedding rare light on how a firm may deploy - and sometimes abuse - the Form U-5 during advisor departures.

January 29, 2026
OFAC Targets Individual Trustee, Sending a Clear Warning to Fiduciaries and Family Offices

In a rare move, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) penalized a former U.S. government official, underscoring that professional gatekeepers can face personal liability for sanctions violations tied to trust administration.