FINRA Panel Order Advisor to Pay $2.6 Million for Soliciting Former Clients

Posted on June 26th, 2024 at 3:14 PM
FINRA Panel Order Advisor to Pay $2.6 Million for Soliciting Former Clients

From the desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law

A FINRA arbitration panel ruled against advisor Nicole E. Sennett for allegedly attempting to solicit former clients after selling her practice to Monocacy Wealth Partners. The panel ordered Sennett to pay $2,557,000 in compensatory damages to Monocacy, based in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, and its founding partners, Scott A. Brantingson and Scott M. Brantingson.

According to AdvisorHub, in addition to the monetary damages, the arbitrators issued an injunction preventing Sennett from soliciting any clients listed in the asset purchase agreement. She also is prohibited from discussing or disparaging Monocacy or its founders, giving financial advice to, or accepting any listed clients, even if the client initiates contact.

Sennett faces additional liability for damages amounting to four times 1 percent of any assets that transfer after the award is issued. Sennett counterclaimed that Monocacy breached the asset purchase agreement by refusing her access to certain books and records. She also requested the panel to void the asset purchase agreement. As reported by AdvisorHub, the panel rejected her counterclaims.

Although Raymond James was not a named party in the arbitration, it controlled the payments to Sennett under the asset purchase agreement. Future payments owed to Sennett are to be released to Monocacy to offset the $2.6 million she owes.

AdvisorHub reports that this case highlights the ongoing risks for buyers in wealth management transactions, as sellers sometimes attempt to restart their practice. Courts have occasionally invalidated non-compete agreements, siding with sellers in such disputes.

 

Eccleston Law LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, transition, regulatory, and disciplinary matters.

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law, finra

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

Jim, Stephany and the whole team were a God send.  We felt like we were put into a situation where we had no advocate. Jim’s team came in with a strong, well laid out strategy on how to get our story heard. Where our outside compliance company had no ability to help, our Broker Dealer was impenitent, and the regulators were aggressive pursuing vague rules, Jim came like a barricade against an assault we did not understand. Though you pay member dues to be affiliated with FINRA and a B/D, you have no voice. The only thing that is truly heard in this un-level playing field is a bulldog’s bark like Jim’s. I would encourage anyone to call Jim and his team to find a real ally in the tough and complicated world of securities regulation. They are truly the best.

Greg P.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

January 26, 2026
James Eccleston Named 2026 Super Lawyer in Securities Litigation

Eccleston Law announces James Eccleston's selection to the 2026 Illinois Super Lawyers list, continuing a track record of excellence since 2005.

January 26, 2026
FINRA Enforcement Actions for Reg BI Violations Surge Past 2024 Levels

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) already has brought more Regulation Best Interest cases in 2025 than it did during all of 2024, according to statements from the regulator’s top enforcement official and a review of FINRA’s disciplinary records by AdvisorHub.

January 23, 2026
JPMorgan Explores Crypto Trading for Institutional Clients as Wall Street Deepens Digital Asset Push

JPMorgan is weighing another significant expansion into cryptocurrency, as the firm considers allowing institutional clients to trade digital assets, according to Bloomberg Law.