Firms Seek FINRA Approval to Relax In-Person Inspection Requirements

Posted on February 22nd, 2021 at 9:54 AM
Firms Seek FINRA Approval to Relax In-Person Inspection Requirements

From the Desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law LLC:

Member firms have requested that the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA)  ease in-person supervision requirements and revise other rules to reflect current digital business operations.

In December, the self-regulator published a regulatory notice seeking public comment on whether FINRA should make changes to its rules, operations, or administrative processes to reflect lessons learned during the pandemic. The pandemic has made the industry aware that the physical location is less relevant to today’s supervisory program than it once was. Firms argue that they properly can supervise their financial advisors by performing a wide variety of functions without compromising their commitment to investor protection.

The regulatory notice also included other recommendations, such as: redefining what is meant by a branch office and an office of supervisory jurisdiction, allowing greater use of electronic signatures, and expanding the number of licensing exams administered online. 

FINRA has adopted a temporary rule that allows remote office inspection for the last year and through the end of this year. The Financial Services Institute (FSI), which represents independent broker-dealers and advisors, stated its members found that remote inspections still promote FINRA's investor protection goal. Widespread technology allows FSI members to conduct assessments using video conferencing, electronic document review, and other tools. FSI also stated that monitoring outside business activities remotely is possible. According to FSI, outside business activities already are often discovered and monitored through automated processes, such as emails, personal bank records and targeted Internet searches.

FSI recommends providing flexibility concerning the number of transactions that representatives may carry out through a “non-branch office.” FSI also cautioned FINRA not to designate representatives working from home as operating in a branch office because that designation would place an undue burden on its members.

Eccleston Law LLC represents financial advisors nationwide. Please contact us to discuss any issues that you may have.

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law, finra, inspections

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

Thank You from the bottom of our hearts for all you have done for us. When we realized this was a very bad investment - we did not know where to turn for help. Then we received your name. When we called you - you were so kind to us and then agreed to help us. For this we are so very grateful. The world would be a much nicer place if there were more people like the two of you in it. We will always remember all the help and kindness you have shown us. Thank you so very very much for everything.

Wayne and Judy S.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

March 12, 2025
GPB Capital Investors May Receive Some Compensation Under Proposed Distribution Plan

GPB Capital Holdings investors have not received returns on their investments since 2018. According to InvestmentNews, after years of litigation, a court-appointed receiver has submitted a plan to return funds to the 17,000 investors who purchased $1.8 billion in GPB limited partnerships.

March 11, 2025
Former CNBC Analyst Pleads Guilty to $2.7 Million Securities Fraud Scheme

James Arthur McDonald Jr., a former financial advisor and frequent CNBC guest analyst, has agreed to plead guilty to securities fraud, admitting to defrauding investors out of at least $2.7 million, as reported by ThinkAdvisor. The felony charge carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in federal prison.

March 10, 2025
Wells Fargo and Merrill Lynch Settle SEC Charges Over Cash Sweep Program Policies

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has announced settlements with Wells Fargo Clearing Services LLC, Wells Fargo Advisors Financial Network LLC, and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated over allegations that they failed to implement proper policies and procedures for their cash sweep programs.