New Treasury Rules Impose AML/CFT Requirements on Investment Advisers

Posted on September 11th, 2024 at 10:58 AM
New Treasury Rules Impose AML/CFT Requirements on Investment Advisers

From the desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law

The U.S. Treasury Department has finalized anti-money-laundering (AML) regulations targeting investment advisers registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). According to the DI Wire, The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) introduced two final rules aimed at curbing money laundering: one for investment advisers and exempt reporting advisers, and another for residential real estate advisers.

These new rules classify Registered Investment Advisers (RIAs) and exempt reporting advisers as “financial institutions” under the Bank Secrecy Act, making them subject to AML and countering the financing of terrorism (CFT) program requirements. This move comes after a Treasury risk assessment revealed that the investment adviser industry has repeatedly been exploited as an entry point for illicit funds tied to foreign corruption, fraud, tax evasion, and other criminal activities.

Historically, AML/CFT obligations have been imposed on banks, broker-dealers, and mutual funds. SEC Chair Gary Gensler supported the proposal earlier this year, emphasizing that the rule is designed to prevent terrorists and criminals from accessing U.S. financial markets through false identities established with investment advisers.

The final rule, while similar to the original proposal, narrows its scope by excluding certain categories of advisers, such as “mid-sized,” “multi-state,” and “pension consultants”, as well as RIAs that do not report assets under management to the SEC. The rule does not apply to state-registered advisers. Those affected must establish a "risk-based and reasonably designed" AML/CFT program, file suspicious activity reports with FinCEN, and maintain specific records related to fund transmittals.

According to DI Wire, firms must comply with the new rule by January 1, 2026. However, RIAs advising mutual funds, which are already covered under the Bank Secrecy Act, will not need to implement additional AML/CFT requirements for those funds.

 

Eccleston Law LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, transition, regulatory, and disciplinary matters.

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

If the regulators are after you, and are trying to make a case against you, and you are going to contest their allegations against you, make sure you have the best securities industry defense lawyers, Eccleston Law Firm. My case was spun into a combination of penalties including fines, cash settlements, CE courses and suspension. They were the best I have seen in action. When all was said and done, they had done their magic, my situation was negotiated and settled with a simple "letter of caution" and a case closed without action. It is the most important legal business decision you will ever make, make it Eccleston Law.

Rick R.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

February 3, 2026
FINRA Accuses Spartan Capital of Widespread Churning That Allegedly Harmed Customers

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has brought a disciplinary complaint against Spartan Capital Securities and several senior leaders of the New York City–based broker-dealer, alleging that the firm facilitated excessive trading that generated millions of dollars in revenue while causing substantial losses to customers.

February 2, 2026
California Investors Allege Unsuitable DST Recommendations in FINRA Arbitration

Two investors from the San Francisco Bay Area have filed a FINRA arbitration claim against brokerage firm Realized Financial and its financial advisors.

January 30, 2026
FINRA Arbitration Panel Orders J.P. Morgan to Amend Form U-5, Flags Potential Pattern of Conduct

A Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) arbitration panel recently issued an unusually detailed decision in a dispute between J.P. Morgan Securities and former advisor Joshua David Sappi Biering, shedding rare light on how a firm may deploy - and sometimes abuse - the Form U-5 during advisor departures.